Optimizing the Public Sector: Bridging the Gap Between Policy and Practice

By Akshat Shah, Aarush Chandna, and Vivaan Awal, GRC 2024 Global Essay Competition Top 10

For decades, the public sector has been the centerpiece of public criticism and has caused frustrations over its biggest flaw: slow and inefficient operations. The public sector comprises many government departments, agencies, and enterprises. It is responsible for economic growth, infrastructure development, employment creation, and increasing social welfare. It delivers important services in education, healthcare, infrastructure, and public safety. The United States government spending is approximately 36% of its GDP with a large portion going towards public sector development. Similarly, it's approximately 44% in Japan and the United Kingdom(International Monetary Fund). However, despite the public sector’s prevalence in society, it is often criticized for its inefficiency in decision-making and budget allocation. These inefficiencies are a consequence of several factors including political interference, bureaucratic red tape, and inefficient resource allocation. As a result, through strategic reforms and new initiatives, policymakers must improve the decision-making process and optimize budget allocations to enhance the positive impact of the public sector.

Inefficiencies in public services remain a common issue, slowing down the ability for rapid decision-making and reform implementations. In India, for example, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREA) designed to provide rural households with employment has recently been delaying wage payments. Looking at a study by Azim Premji University, during 2016-17, 21% of payments were made on time with 47% having partial delays due to administrative issues, lack of coordination between structures, inconsistent funding, and failure to ensure effective completion. Bureaucratic “red tape” as seen in (MGNREA) slows the distribution of funds affecting those in dire need of it. Individuals and families living in rural areas depend heavily on the distribution of wages. Beneficiaries of (MNGREA), utilize it as a primary source of income for all their basic expenses. Delays in wages affect the livelihoods of these individuals, with around 70% already surviving paycheck to paycheck and not more than 27% having sufficient savings accounts to aid in times of emergency. As shown in the infographic, the expenditure-to-income ratio for “Destitutes” and “Aspirers” is 114% and 100% respectively, indicating that individuals in these categories spend more than they earn, relying on external support to make ends meet. This leaves almost no room for unexpected costs or any forms of savings as shown for the "Destitutes," the saving-to-income ratio is negative, while the "Aspirers" have no savings. Lack of financial stability indicates rural populations have no room for delays in income flow, with even a slight disruption leading to severe hardships such as the inability to afford healthcare, shelter, and necessities. In these times of crisis, studies show that many households are forced to take loans from moneylenders, trapping them in cycles of debt with high interest rates. Households choose to struggle to afford daily essentials, leading to reduced food consumption, and compromising health to save money. The situation also impacts children’s education, as families may get children out of school to cut costs or have them contribute to household income, keeping the cycle of poverty going on across generations. Therefore, efficient public sector reforms are required to break poverty cycles and develop rural economies and communities.

Improving decision-making and budget allocation in the public sector is a multifaceted process. The capabilities of public officials making decisions are imperative to effective and efficient decision-making. Therefore, training and skill-building is the first step. A prime example of this is Singapore’s Civil Service College(CSC). The primary goal of the CSC is to design programs to facilitate the growth of public service officials allowing them to thrive in their roles, benefiting the communities they serve. The next step is effectively leveraging technology. Recent advances in digital technology, including AI, can enhance decision-making. Leveraging technology under the right circumstances can improve decision-makers' understanding of the problems affecting the community. Estonia, for example, employs an e-governance system with many advantages including making communication with the government more feasible. This allows the government to better understand the problems of civilians and effectively serve them. Such digital technology-based systems could impactfully serve the public sector in improving decision-making and be taken one step further by applying Machine Learning models and big data analytics to properly analyze and predict future outcomes. However such improvements are pointless if not complimented with the proper resources to execute the decisions made, which starts with budget allocation. Budget allocation in the public sector is done through incremental budgeting. Incremental budgeting is the idea that an organization analyses its previous period's expenditure and makes necessary incremental changes for the next period. To efficiently allocate fiscal resources the public sector should look to performance-based budgeting(PBB). PBB is a method that suggests that budgeting should be done by only looking at the overall impact of an expense. So, the organization only evaluates the intended outcome of the used fiscal resources. This allows officials to measure the overall social impact of monetary resources. Making their objectives measurable and focusing on monetary resources where they are most needed can have the greatest impact on the community. This method will greatly improve the effectiveness of the public sector; however, to properly address these inefficiencies, there must be a focus on decentralization.

Decentralization refers to splitting the authority from one central part into smaller groups. In doing so, we give the power of decision-making and budget allocation to smaller authorities. This is effective because local officials often have a much better understanding of the issues facing their respective communities than a central authority might, so the overall social impact would be much more effective as it minimizes political and bureaucratic interference.

Enhancing decision-making processes and improving budget allocation is not just about public sector efficiency, but also about sustainable development and public trust. By adopting performance-based budgeting, decentralization, training and skill building, and leveraging technology, policymakers can overcome the challenges faced by the inefficient public sector and improve the quality of life for its citizens. While the reformation of the public sector may be complex, the benefits yielded by an efficient public sector outweigh its drawbacks.

Bibliography

Azim Premji University. “Analysis of Payment Delays and Delay Compensation in MGNREGA,” 2018. https://azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/publications/2018/cse-working-paper-series/analysis-of-payme nt-delays-and-delay-compensation-in-mgnrega.

Byjus.com. “...,” 2022. https://byjus.com/question-answer/q19-which-of-following-is-correct-difference-between-central sector-schemes-centrally-sponsored-schemes-1/.

ec.europa.eu. “Inforegio - Estonia Leads the Way with Advanced E-Services for Citizens,” n.d. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/projects/estonia/estonia-leads-the-way-with-advanced-e-se rvices-for-citizens.

Goswami, Sweta. “Energy Budget: Power PSUs Get 17% More Budgetary Allocation.” Moneycontrol, February 2024. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/budget/energy-budget-power-psus-get-17-more-bu dgetary-allocation-12174461.html.

Grant Thornton Bharat. “Union Budget 2024 Should Address These Critical Government & Public Sector Challenges, Experts Say,” July 19, 2024. https://www.grantthornton.in/insights/media-articles/union-budget-2024-should-address-these-crit ical-government-and-public-sector-challenges-experts-say/.

India, in. “Public Sector Undertakings in India - a Complete Overview.” Groww. Groww, 2016. https://groww.in/blog/public-sector-undertaking-in-india.

Joshi, P.L. “Zero Base Budgeting: A Survey of Practices in India.” Omega 17, no. 4 (January 1989): 381–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(89)90052-2.

Panja, Saurandhri. “Challenges and Opportunities for Public Sector Administration in India.” Journal of Management and Administration Provision 1, no. 3 (December 31, 2021): 60–64. https://doi.org/10.55885/jmap.v1i3.224.

PFM. “Rwanda: A Home-Grown Performance Based Budgeting Approach,” April 22, 2021. https://blog-pfm.imf.org/en/pfmblog/2021/04/rwanda-a-home-grown-performance-based-budgetin g-approach.

Price360.in. “Price 360,” 2023. https://www.price360.in/tags.php?tag=9.

“PUBLIC SECTOR in INDIA (Overview & Profile),” n.d. https://dpe.gov.in/sites/default/files/Chapter-1-Overview%20&%20Profile_Final_0.pdf.

Team, Edukemy. “Challenges for Public Sector Enterprises (PSUs) – UPSC Economy Notes.” Blog -. Edukemy, March 27, 2024.

https://edukemy.com/blog/challenges-for-public-sector-enterprises-psus-upsc-economy-notes/.

TOI Business Desk. “Top 10 Fastest Growing Major Economies in the World 2024: India Beats US, China in This Ranking! Check List.” The Times of India. Times Of India, August 26, 2024. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/top-10-fastest-growing-major-econom ies-in-the-world-2024-india-beats-us-china-in-this-ranking-check-list/photostory/112813914.cms.

Unacademy. “Public Sectors in Indian Economy: Objectives, Importance, Performance, and Problems,” n.d. https://unacademy.com/content/bank-exam/study-material/general-awareness/public-sectors-in-ind ian-economy-objectives-importance-performance-and-problems/.

www.csc.gov.sg. “What We Do,” n.d. https://www.csc.gov.sg/what-we-do/.