Waste Not: Rethinking Global Resource Management
By Fatma Deniz Aydin, GRC 2024 Global Essay Competition Top 30
"The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything." - Albert Einstein[1].
These words hold profound significance when considering the global waste crisis. While some may turn a blind eye to the ever-growing mountains of waste, their inaction contributes significantly to environmental degradation [3,4]. Waste management is essentially important for sustainable development, and although it is known that sustainable production and consumption patterns are essential for the reduction of waste production that constitutes a significant problem for the world even today, such environmental challenges are not yet taken seriously by all segments of society [2]. In addition, these challenges are becoming more and more inevitable with the globalized and impersonal human population [4]. The world should be ready for the future and take the necessary measures for global waste management [2]. The movement of the circular economy and waste management is reshaping business processes, creating sustainable practices, reducing costs and waste production, and eliminating environmental risks [5]. Furthermore, recycling strategies can be found in wild nature, and such systems have existed in nature for millions of years, which should be addressed by man [6]. So, life is an unbreakable cycle, and all kinds of unwanted or unusable items on earth can be converted into new products through the right processes [7]. The environmental impact of extraction and processing of raw materials is tremendous [8]. Earth Overshoot Day (EOD) is the date that marks when humanity’s demand for ecological resources and services in a given year exceeds what Earth can regenerate in that year [9,10]. Every year, the EOD is along the lines of evasion, but the depletion of natural resources has significant impacts [11]. Ironically, a part of the resource is converted into solid waste after use [9,10,11]. The Global Waste Generation is continuous [2,11]. According to the World Bank’s data, more than 2 billion tonnes of waste are generated per year [1,12]. This situation is worse for developing countries, which generate the most waste and increase with industrial growth, illiteracy, urbanization, overpopulation, and toxic substances in waste, etc. This process leads to severe consequences [13,14].
There is a circular economic concept of zero waste [5]. The Industrial Sector (Construction, Industry, Electricity, Agriculture) which generates and uses the most resources and waste, and directly affects the environment because it significantly affects air, water and soil [15]. The largest part of waste is generated by industrial processes [16], significantly impacting air, water, and soil quality [17]. Construction and related demolition activities are one of the major contributors of this industrial waste. According to the report “Global Waste Generation Increases”, the amount of waste generated in the world has exploded, and the construction sector is the largest waste producer in terms of weight and volume [12]. The construction industry produces about 40% of the waste and accounts for about 20% of energy use [18,19]. Waste management and reduction are crucial for sustainable development [2,4]. The principle of 'Reduce, Reuse, Recycle (RRR)' plays a key role in mitigating the environmental impact of waste generation [20,21]. Since many people and governments attempt to apply RRR principle in their daily life even if they don’t understand it very well. This essay explores the effectiveness of this principle, challenges in its implementation, and the broader issues of overproduction, overconsumption, and industrialization in waste generation.
The purpose of the RRR principle is to minimize waste at its source. Reduction means reducing unnecessary consumption and production, which decreases waste production. Reuse extends the lifespan of products and materials, reduces the demand for new resources. Recycling transforms waste materials into new products, saves resources and diverts waste from landfill [17]. Despite its reputation, applying the RRR principle faces challenges. Consumer behavior, limited recycling infrastructure and lack of financial incentives for companies to prioritize waste reduction remain barriers [21]. In addition, the widespread adoption of RRR is hindered by limited public awareness and education about waste reduction [22].
Overproduction caused by consumer demand and industrial practices leads to overproduction of goods. This creates surplus and waste when products are not fully utilized or expire quickly. Combating overproduction requires a reassessment of production methods and a shift to sustainable production methods [23].
Excessive consumption resulting from consumerism and marketing strategies increases the overuse of resources and the generation of waste. Disposable products and single-use items significantly contribute to waste [24]. Educating consumers about conscious consumption and promoting sustainable, reusable alternatives can reduce overconsumption [22].
Additionally, rampant consumerism, propelled by aggressive marketing, exacerbates resource overuse and waste generation, underscoring the need for consumer education on conscious consumption and the promotion of sustainable alternatives. Developing countries often prioritize immediate economic growth over environmental concerns, a trend influenced by historical colonial legacies characterized by resource exploitation and uneven technology access. To illustrate, it's akin to persuading a marathon runner mid-race to consider the scenic route—a shift away from immediate goals to long-term vision. Nonetheless, these nations must integrate sustainable solutions that do not hinder economic progress. The adoption of green technologies, coupled with international cooperation, promises a pathway toward resource efficiency and sustainable development. Developing countries often prioritize economic growth and industrialization, which increases waste production [15]. Implementation of climate frameworks that emphasize sustainable practices can increase awareness and encourage responsible production and consumption in all societies [13].
"Climate change doesn't respect borders; it doesn't respect who you are - rich and poor, small and big. Therefore, this is what we call 'global challenges' which require global solidarity" [25]. These words of Ban Ki-moon2 emphasize the nature of the responsibility of each person in climate matters, regardless of the level of development of the country in which they live. A balance of economic growth and environmental sustainability is crucial [15]. Developing countries can adopt green technologies and policies that promote resource efficiency and waste reduction without jeopardizing economic development [13,15]. International cooperation and financial support can facilitate this transition [26]. While the principle of RRR has been proven to minimize waste production and environmental impact, challenges such as overproduction, overconsumption and the historical context of developing countries require a multifaceted approach [21,22]. Examining the sustainability of historical practices compared to contemporary approaches sheds light on evolving environmental perspectives and human impacts. Although historical practices were often characterized by a simpler way of life and less resource-intensive technology, they had certain enduring characteristics. Communities relied more on local resources, used materials and produced less waste than modern industrial societies [27]. However, it is important to understand that this historical resilience was due to necessity and limited technological development [28]. Historical buildings offer an interesting comparison with modern sustainable buildings. Although many have stood the test of time, their durability can be questioned in today's environment. Traditional buildings often used locally sourced materials and were effectively designed to adapt to the environment [27,28]. However, their energy efficiency and waste management practices may not meet modern standards set by climate frameworks [29].
Historical colonial practices have left persistent economic inequalities between developed and developing countries. Developing countries, often former colonies, face challenges related to economic dependence, limited access to technology, and inadequate infrastructure, which affect their ability to implement sustainable management practices [14,18,19].
Cultural norms and socio-economic conditions shaped by historical experiences influence the attitude towards waste and consumption. In developed countries, where a single-use culture is prevalent, efforts to promote reuse and recycling may be resisted by established consumption patterns [14]. On the other hand, developing countries may prioritize economic growth over environmental issues due to the immediate need for development [6,7].
Historical administrative structures and policy frameworks of industrialized countries have evolved to prioritize environmental protection and sustainability [7]. In contrast, developing countries may face challenges in implementing a strong regulatory framework and enforcing environmental standards due to historical governance legacies and resource constraints [14].
Historical relationships and international aid programs influence the formulation of sustainable development initiatives. Developed countries often provide technical and financial assistance to developing countries to support sustainable waste management and environmental protection, reflecting historical responsibility and promoting global partnerships [26].
Based on the presented analysis, the following recommendations can be made to respond to global waste problems and promote sustainability:
Global cooperation: promote international cooperation in the field of sustainable waste strategies, share knowledge and technology between developed and developing. countries This may include the creation of knowledge-sharing platforms, joint research initiatives and technology transfer programs.
Political interventions: implement national and regional policies that promote waste reduction, resource efficiency and the circular economy. Examples include extended producer responsibility systems, eco-design regulations for products, and financial incentives for waste reduction techniques.
Public Awareness Campaigns ( Climate Framework [29] ): Educate consumers about responsible consumption, waste techniques and the importance of sustainable lifestyles. Utilize various communication channels such as public announcements, educational programs and social media campaigns to raise awareness.
Technological innovation: Invest in research and development of innovative waste management technologies such as advanced recycling processes, biodegradable materials and waste-to-energy. Public-private partnerships and dedicated research funding can facilitate this.
Financial support: Provide financial assistance and technology transfer opportunities to support developing countries in moving towards sustainable waste management. This can include grants, low-interest loans and capacity building programs.
Historical Acknowledgment: Recognize the historical context of industrialization, resource exploitation and colonial legacies in shaping current differences in waste management. Developed countries must recognize their historical responsibility and cooperate with developing countries to achieve equitable and sustainable waste management.
The environmental effects of waste production require a multifaceted approach that goes beyond the RRR principle alone [21,22]. As Ban Ki-moon said in his words [25], we as humanity must act to avoid a self-centered perspective on climate, so that we can use the climate framework and speak the same language on climate, the RRR principle, zero carbon, emissions and zero waste measures. By promoting international cooperation, implementing effective policies, promoting public awareness, encouraging technological innovation and financial support, a global transition to sustainable waste management can be achieved. Recognizing the historical context of waste management inequities is critical to effectively addressing them. By learning from the past, embracing modern innovations and working together, we can ensure a future characterized by responsible use of resources, minimal waste and a healthier planet. As Albert Einstein reminds us [1], we should not remain spectators in this environmental crisis. By acting and taking a multifaceted approach [21], we can ensure a sustainable future for future generations.
Bibliography
1. Zondi, Si, And P. Pillay. "Ethical Leadership And Good Governance In The South African." Lessons From Political Leadership In Africa: Towards Inspirational And Transformational Leaders (2022): 58.
2. Zorpas, Antonis A., et al. "Crisis in leadership vs waste management." Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration 6 (2021): 1-5. 3. Zipperer, Wayne C., Robert Northrop, and Michael Andreu. "Urban development and environmental degradation." Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. 2020.
4. Khan, Sufyan Ullah, and Yu Cui. "Identifying the impact factors of sustainable development efficiency: integrating environmental degradation, population density, industrial structure, GDP per capita, urbanization, and technology." Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29.37 (2022): 56098-56113.
5. Tomić, Tihomir, and Daniel Rolph Schneider. "Circular economy in waste management–Socio-economic effect of changes in waste management system structure." Journal of environmental management 267 (2020): 110564.
6. Duckworth, Chloë N., and Andrew Wilson, eds. Recycling and reuse in the Roman economy. Oxford University Press, 2020.
7. Bui, Tat-Dat, et al. "Opportunities and challenges for solid waste reuse and recycling in emerging economies: A hybrid analysis." Resources, Conservation and Recycling 177 (2022): 105968.
8. Spooren, Jeroen, et al. "Near-zero-waste processing of low-grade, complex primary ores and secondary raw materials in Europe: technology development trends." Resources, Conservation and Recycling 160 (2020): 104919.
9. Christoffel, Thomas J. "Sustainability: Cooperation Industry Earth 2300–“Think local planet, act regionally”." The Elgar Companion to Geography, Transdisciplinarity and Sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. 406-413.
10. Initiative, Sustainable HECAP+, et al. "Environmental sustainability in basic research: a perspective from HECAP+." arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02837 (2023).
11. Lin, David, Leopold Wambersie, and Mathis Wackernagel. "Estimating the date of earth overshoot day 2021." Nowcasting the World’s Footprint & Biocapacity for (2021): 1-8.
12. Chen, David Meng-Chuen, et al. "The world’s growing municipal solid waste: trends and impacts." Environmental Research Letters 15.7 (2020): 074021. 13. Debrah, Justice Kofi, Diogo Guedes Vidal, and Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis. "Raising awareness on solid waste management through formal education for sustainability: A developing countries evidence review." Recycling 6.1 (2021): 6.
14. Maalouf, Amani, and Pariatamby Agamuthu. "Waste management evolution in the last five decades in developing countries–A review." Waste Management & Research 41.9 (2023): 1420-1434.
15. Roy, Poritosh, et al. "A review on the challenges and choices for food waste valorization: Environmental and economic impacts." ACS environmental Au 3.2 (2023): 58-75.
16. Soares, Sara, et al. "Unveiling the data: An analysis of plastic waste with emphasis on the countries of the E³UDRES2 alliance." Heliyon (2024).
17. Bushnell, Kristen, et al. "Reduce, reuse, recycle." Utah, USA(2011). 18. Asif, Muhammad, et al. "Traversing the waste spectrum: unveiling Pakistan's MSW landscape and solutions." Journal of Sustainable Research In Management of Agroindustry (SURIMI)3.2 (2023).
19. Daoud, Ahmed Osama, et al. "Exploring the relationship between materials procurement and waste minimization in the construction industry: The case of Egypt." International Conference on Sustainability, Green Buildings, Environmental Engineering & Renewable Energy (SGER 2018). 2018.
20. Madaan, Geetika, et al. "Reduce, reuse, recycle: circular economic principles, sustainability and entrepreneurship in developing ecosystems." Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development (2024).
21. Samiha, Bouanini. "The importance of the 3R principle of municipal solid waste management for achieving sustainable development." Mediterranean journal of social sciences 4.3 (2013): 129-135.
22. Hasan, S. E. "Public awareness is key to successful waste management." Journal of environmental science and health, Part A 39.2 (2004): 483-492.
23. Lintsen, Harry, et al. "Agriculture and foods: Overproduction and overconsumption." Well-being, Sustainability and Social Development: The Netherlands 1850–2050 (2018): 397-416.
24. Joo, Junghee, et al. "Single-use disposable waste upcycling via thermochemical conversion pathway." Polymers 13.16 (2021): 2617.
25. Ki-Moon, Ban. Resolved: Uniting nations in a divided world. Columbia University Press, 2021.
26. Wilson, David C., and Costas A. Velis. "Waste management–still a global challenge in the 21st century: An evidence-based call for action." Waste Management & Research 33.12 (2015): 1049-1051.
27. Change, Cultural. "Global change, history, and sustainability." The way the wind blows: climate change, history, and human Action (2000): 331.
28. Caradonna, Jeremy L., ed. Routledge handbook of the history of sustainability. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis, 2017.
29. Cavalcanti, Tiago, Zeina Hasna, and Cezar Santos. Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Aggregate and Distributional Effects. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics, 2020.